Socialized Medicine Kills

From the New York Post...

UK'S BAD MEDICINE WHY U.S. HAS BETTER ODDS VS. CANCER DAVID GRATZER

....The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development reports on both the incidence of prostate cancer in member nations and the number of resultant deaths. According to OECD data published in 2000, 49 Britons per 100,000 were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 28 per 100,000 died of it.

This means that 57 percent of Britons diagnosed with prostate cancer died of it; consequently, just 43 percent survived. Economist John Goodman, in "Lives at Risk," arrives at precisely the same conclusion: "In the United States, slightly less than one in five people diagnosed with prostate cancer dies of the disease. In the United Kingdom, 57 percent die."

None of this is surprising. In the United Kingdom, only about 40 percent of cancer patients see an oncologist and, histori-cally, the government has been reluctant to fund new (and often better) cancer drugs.

So why do the critics think that Britain's survival rates are as high as America's? The main reason is that they are citing overall mortality rates, which are indeed, as Ezra Klein writes, similar across various countries. That is, the percentage of all Americans who die from prostate cancer is similar to the percentage of all Britons who do. But this misses the point, since a much higher percentage of Americans than Britons are diagnosed with prostate cancer in the first place. If you are a patient already diagnosed with prostate cancer, like Rudy Giuliani, your chances of survival - as Giuliani correctly said - are far higher in the United States....
whole thing here